DETAIL

FDM 3D Printing materials compared

Views: 89    

facebook sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
wechat sharing button
linkedin sharing button
sharethis sharing button

FDM 3D Printing materials compared

Introduction

Choosing the right kind of material to printing a given object is now increasingly difficult, as the 3D Printing marketplace sees the standard emergence of new components radically. In FDM 3D Printing , PLA and Ab muscles have historically been both main polymers used, but their initial dominance was mostly fortuitous, so there should not be any major roadblocks for other polymers to play a key role in the future of FDM.
We are now seeing new products become more popular, both pure polymers and composites. In this study, we focus on the main pure polymers that exist in the market today: PLA, ABS, PET, Nylon, TPU (Flexible) and PC. We sum up the key differences between their properties in snapshot profiles so that users can make a quick decision about the best polymer to use for their application.

 

Methodology

Materials are usually graded along 3 classes: mechanical efficiency, visual quality, and procedure. In this full case, we further breakdown these categories to color a clearer picture of the polymer’s properties. The decision of material depends upon what the user really wants to print really, therefore we listed the main element decision criteria had a need to select a material (apart from cost and speed):

 

FDM 3D Printing materials compared

A spider web graph demonstrating the material properties that will be in comparison

 

  • Ease of printing: How easy it is to print a material: bed adhesion, max printing speed, frequency of failed prints, flow accuracy, ease to feed into the printer etc.

  • Visual quality: How good the finished object looks. More info on how we test it here.

  • Max stress: Maximum stress the object can undergo before breaking when slowly pulling on it.

  • Elongation at break: Maximum length the object has been stretched before breaking.

  • Impact resistance: Energy needed to break an object with a sudden impact.

  • Layer adhesion (isotropy): How good the adhesion between layers of material is. It is linked to “isotropy” (=uniformity in all directions): the better the layer adhesion, the more isotropic the object will be.

  • Heat resistance: Max temperature the object can sustain before softening and deforming.

  • We all also provide additional information that is not captured in the diagram, for one of two reasons:

  • They will be neither “good” nor “bad” in essence; they are just houses that are suitable for some applications and never for others, such as rigidity.

  • All of us don’t have a good quantitative evaluation of it, but we know costly important factor, such as humidity level of resistance or toxicity.


Results

Every single material has been ranked over the following criteria on an one particular (low) to 5 (high) degree. These are relative grades meant for the FDM process -- they would look quite different another manufacturing technologies were considered. Using the data from Optimatter, the polymers have been placed along the different criteria viewed as:

FDM 3D Printing materials compared

Analysis results for all six polymers displayed in one graph.


PLA

PLA is the easiest polymer to print and provides good visual quality. It is very rigid and actually quite strong, but is very brittle.

4

The material profile of PLA

Pros

Cons

Biosourced, biodegradable

Low humidity resistance

Odorless

Can't be glued easily

Can be post-processed with sanding paper and painted with acrylics


Good UV resistance



ABS

ABS is usually picked over PLA when higher temperature resistance and higher toughness is required.

5

The material profile of ABS


Pros

Cons

Can be post-processed with acetone vapors for a glossy finish

UV sensitive

Can be post-processed with sanding paper and painted with acrylics

Odor when printing

Acetone can also be used as strong glue

Potentially high fume emissions

Good abrasion resistance



PET

PET is a slightly softer polymer that is well rounded and possesses interesting additional properties with few major drawbacks.

6

The material profile of PET

Pros

Cons

Can come in contact with foods

Heavier than PLA and ABS

High humidity resistance


High chemical resistance


Recyclable


Good abrasion resitance


Can be post-processes with sanding paper and painted with acrylics



Nylon

Nylon possesses great mechanical properties, and in particular, the best impact resistance for a non-flexible filament. Layer adhesion can be an issue, however.

7

The material profile of Nylon

Pros

Cons

Good chemical resistance

Absorbs moisture

High strength

Potentially high fume emissions


TPU

TPU is mostly used for flexible applications, but its very high impact resistance can open for other applications.

8

The material profile of TPU

Pros

Cons

Good abrasion resistance

Difficult to post process

Good resistance to oil and grease

Can't be glued easily


PC

PC is the strongest material of all, and can be an interesting alternative to ABS as the properties are quite similar.

9

The material profile of PC

Pros

Cons

Can be sterilized

UV sensitive

Easy to post-process (sanding)



Conclusion

Selecting the right polymer is critical to get the correct properties for a 3D published part, especially if the part contains a functional use. This article will support users find the right material depending on properties they need. However , materials suppliers also often provide combines or add additives to change the properties of the genuine polymer (e. g. adding carbon fiber to make the material stiffer). We are not addressing these types of more complex formulations in this article, you could find data on some of these items in our optimization tool for OptiMatter.


Disclaimer

  • The grades given in this article happen to be for an average polymer symbolizing the general chemistry, but the overall performance will vary depending on the actual item or supplier the user purchases from.

  • All the data root our grades in this research was measured by THREE DIMENSIONAL Matter, with the exception of Heat Level of resistance, for which we used the glass temperature given by multiple filament suppliers.

  • For the sections called Additional considerations, we are using a combination of thirdparty assessments and our own findings.

  • The Nylon type all of us discuss in this article is Nylon 6, not Nylon 11 or 12.

  • Visual top quality is tested without any significant post-processing. There are ways to smoothen the prints and improve the quality of vision of a given polymer considerably (e. g. using acetone vapor on ABS).

  • The toxicity of 3D printing photos polymers is still not very very well understood and is a factor that may play a bigger role later on. We are basing our feedback regarding toxicity on one research by Azimi et al. 


Ready To Start Your Project? Contact Us Now!

QUICK LINK

SERVICES

CONTACT US

Room 501,Building 18,Pan Asian Center, Duantang East Road, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
Tel: +86-574-27825517
Fax: +86-574-27825518
Zip Code: 315010
Email: Sales@Yea-Lin.com

FOLLOW US

© Copyright 2019 by Yea-Lin Industries. Privacy Policy. ISO 9001:2015 Certified